End-of-Arm Tooling and Grippers

Parallel, angular and vacuum grippers, grip force and vacuum cup sizing, tool changers, compliance and fail-safe design.

What the tool must do

The end-of-arm tool (EOAT) is the part of the robot that touches the work, and it usually decides whether a cell succeeds. It must pick up the part reliably at the speed the cycle needs, release it where wanted, survive variation in the parts, stay within the robot’s payload (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time), and be safe when something goes wrong. Most robot problems that are blamed on the arm are tool problems: a part that slips, a vacuum leak, a tool too heavy or too long.

RequirementQuestion to ask
PartMass, size, shape, material, surface, variation, fragility, orientation
ProcessSpeed and acceleration, accuracy of the place, force at the place, any contact with a process (welding heat, paint, coolant)
RobotPayload and moment (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time), flange pattern, services on the arm (air, power, signals)
EnvironmentTemperature, dirt, swarf, washdown, cleanroom, explosive atmosphere
SafetyWhat happens on loss of air or power; sharp edges; pinch points (see Safety: Standards, Safeguarding and Cobots)
ChangeoverHow many product types, how long to switch, tool changer or adjustable fingers
Holding a part: friction grip and vacuum cupgripper bodyNNfriction mu Nweight m (g + a)Friction grip: 2 mu N >= m (g + a) x safety factorvacuum lineatmospherepressesweight m (g + a)Vacuum: F = delta P x A >= m (g + a) x safety factor
The two commonest ways to hold a part: friction between fingers and part, and atmospheric pressure on a vacuum cup. The weight includes the acceleration of the move.

Gripper types

ToolBest forNotes
Parallel gripperPrismatic parts held between two fingersPneumatic or electric; custom fingers for each part; strong and simple
Angular (pivot) gripperRound parts, long reach into machinesCompact; the fingers swing, so the grip point moves
Three- and four-finger (centric) grippersCylindrical parts, centering a partSelf-centering; good for turned parts
Internal (expanding) grippersParts held by a boreUse the inside; no fingers outside
Vacuum cups and padsFlat, smooth, non-porous surfaces: sheet, boxes, glass, traysNeeds a vacuum source and a sensor; leakage on rough surfaces
Foam vacuum padsPorous or rough surfaces, cartonsHigh flow; seal over small gaps
Magnetic grippersSteel sheet and partsResidual magnetism; picks up two sheets; limited on oily or thin parts
Needle and soft grippersFabrics, foam, fragile or irregular itemsSpecialized; soft fingers conform to the shape
Electroadhesive and Bernoulli grippersThin, delicate sheets (films, wafers, solar cells)Little or no contact force
Adaptive and robotic handsMixed, unknown partsExpensive and less robust; best for research and special jobs

Friction grip: how much force?

A parallel gripper holds the part by friction. With a friction coefficient μ between finger and part, a normal force N on each of n contacts, and a part that must be lifted and accelerated (a in addition to gravity) with a safety factor:

μ N n ≥ m (g + a) × SF N = m (g + a) SF ÷ (μ n)

Worked example: a 2.1 kg part

  • Two fingers (n = 2), steel parts with rubber-faced fingers, μ = 0.3 (use a low value; oil lowers it), safety factor 2, and a move that accelerates the part at 10 m/s² (about 1 g) upward: N = 2.1 × (9.81 + 10) × 2 ÷ (0.3 × 2) = 139 N per finger.
  • A pure static hold, with no acceleration, would need only 69 N: the move, not the weight, sets the force.
  • With a high-friction urethane finger face (μ = 0.6) the force halves to 69 N: friction is the cheapest way to cut the force, the gripper size and the weight.
  • A pneumatic gripper with a 20 mm piston at 6 bar gives F = P A = 188 N before losses; with a typical efficiency of 80 % split over two fingers that is about 75 N per finger at the cylinder, less at the fingertip if the fingers are long (the force falls with the distance from the pivot or the guide). Use the gripper maker’s force chart at your finger length.
  • Two rules: grip force must be ample but not crush the part; and the force the gripper makers quote is at the base of the finger, at the stated pressure, so check the finger length and the supply pressure (a gripper at 4 bar, not 6, delivers two thirds of the force).
  • Use form closure where you can: fingers shaped to the part (a V-groove, a pocket) hold it by geometry as well as friction, and need less force.
  • Grip where the part is stiff, close to its center of gravity, so it does not rotate between the fingers.
  • Electric grippers let you set force and stroke in software and report the width (useful for checking the part), but cost more and are slower to change force.

Vacuum cups

F = ΔP × A permitted mass = F ÷ (g × SF)

Worked example: one cup, then a box

  • One 40 mm cup at a vacuum of −0.6 bar (60 kPa below atmosphere): area = π ÷ 4 × 0.04² = 1 257 mm², force = 60 000 × 0.001257 = 75.4 N.
  • Vertical lift with a safety factor of 2: mass = 75.4 ÷ (9.81 × 2) = 3.84 kg per cup. Fast horizontal moves or friction-only holding with a factor of 4 or more: 1.92 kg.
  • A 5 kg box carried on 4 cups of 30 mm: each gives 42.4 N, together 170 N. With 30 % lost to leakage and tilt, the usable force is 119 N. The load, lifted at 5 m/s² with a factor of 2, is 148 N: not enough.
  • Sideways forces are carried by friction, and are small: the cups hold 59 N sideways at μ = 0.5, against a 30 N inertia force at 6 m/s² for the box. Slow the horizontal acceleration, or use cups with a lip, stops or a gripper with side supports.
  • Real cup force is lower than the theoretical because of seal leakage, surface roughness and cup flex: use the cup maker’s rated force and keep a factor of 4 for rough, oily or tilted loads.

Worked example: how long to build vacuum?

An ejector with a free-air flow of 25 L/min evacuates the cups and hose. For a volume V = 0.05 L it needs about t = (V ÷ Q) ln(patm ÷ ptarget) = (0.05 ÷ 25 × 60 s) × ln(101.3 ÷ 41.3) = 0.11 s to reach −60 kPa. Doubling the line volume to 0.12 L (a long hose) takes 0.26 s. That is gripper time added to every cycle (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time): keep the ejector close to the cups and the hose short.

ComponentChoiceNotes
Cup shapeFlat (stiff, flat sheet), bellows (uneven or curved), oval (long thin parts)Bellows cups lift and compensate for height; flat cups resist sliding
Cup materialNitrile, silicone, polyurethaneSilicone is soft and marks less; polyurethane wears least; check temperature and oil
Vacuum sourceEjector (venturi), pump or blowerEjectors are light, cheap and use compressed air; pumps and blowers suit high-flow porous loads
ControlVacuum sensor, air-saving valve, blow-offA pulse of air releases the part cleanly and clears dust
FilterIn-line filter near the cupsDust blocks ejectors; check it on a schedule

Fingers and stroke

Worked example: how far must the fingers open?

  • A part 60 mm wide ±0.5 mm is picked from a nest. The fingers must open to at least the largest part plus a clearance on each side: 60.5 + 2 × 3 = 66.5 mm.
  • They must also close on the smallest part: 59.5 mm. The stroke between those two settings, 7.0 mm, is the real working stroke; choose a gripper whose adjustment range and tolerance of the pick location cover it, with the clearance larger than the robot’s placing error.
  • Fingers of aluminum instead of steel: a finger of 120 × 20 × 10 mm weighs 65 g in aluminum and 188 g in steel; for two fingers 0.1 m from the wrist axis the difference in inertia is 0.0025 kg·m². Small, but it is mass at the end of the lever; drill out the fingers and use plastic or aluminum where the loads allow.
  • Make fingers replaceable and adjustable, with dowel locations, so a worn or damaged finger is changed in minutes and the tool center point is unchanged (see Coordinate Frames and Kinematics).
  • Add soft pads (urethane, rubber) where parts are delicate or friction is needed; check they do not mark or leave residue.
  • Support long parts at more than one place, or they sag and rotate between the fingers.
  • Chamfer the finger tips and the nest so that a part off by a millimeter still goes in.

Compliance and collisions

The robot’s position error (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy) and the part’s variation are rarely zero. Compliance lets the tool give a little: a floating gripper base, a remote center compliance (RCC) device for inserting parts, or a soft finger. A collision sensor (a breakaway clutch with a switch) protects the tool and the robot in a crash, and stops the robot before damage.

Worked example: inserting a 10 mm peg

  • The peg has 0.1 mm total clearance in its hole, but the robot and the part position are uncertain to ±0.4 mm (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy). Without help the peg would land on the hole’s edge.
  • A lead-in chamfer on the hole of at least 0.4 − 0.1 = 0.35 mm per side lets the peg find the hole; a compliant device lets it follow the chamfer without jamming.
  • Jamming: a rigidly held peg that enters the hole with a sideways offset can wedge when the depth of insertion is more than about 1 ÷ (2 μ) times the diameter. With μ = 0.2 that ratio is about 2.5: beyond it, pushing harder only locks the peg. Compliance and a chamfer keep the push along the hole’s axis.
  • Force sensing or motor-current monitoring allows a search (a small spiral) and detection of seating (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy).

Tool changers and multi-function tools

A tool changer lets the robot switch tools automatically: a master plate on the robot and a tool plate on each tool, locked pneumatically or electrically, passing air, power and signals through the coupling. It lets one robot handle several product formats or do several jobs, but adds mass and length (often 0.5 to 2 kg and 30 to 50 mm).

Worked example: what does a changeover cost?

If a tool change takes 3 s to put one tool back and take another, and the cell changes tool 12 times an hour (twice per change: drop and pick), it spends 72 s an hour, or 2.0 % of the time, changing tools. Cheap if the cycle is 20 seconds, expensive if the tool changes every cycle: then use a multi-function tool with two grippers on one plate.

  • Multi-gripper tools (two grippers back to back, or a gripper and a vacuum pad) pick one part while carrying another, saving a trip.
  • Count the signals and the air lines in the coupler before choosing it; add spare ways.
  • Keep tool stands clean and in reach, with a sensor to check that a tool is present in its stand and on the robot.

Fail-safe design and grip checking

  • What happens when the air or power fails? A gripper that opens drops the part. Use designs that hold on loss of supply (spring-loaded, self-locking, or with a check valve and an air reservoir) where a dropped part is dangerous or expensive.
  • Confirm the grip before the robot moves: an end-of-stroke sensor on the gripper (closed on a part, not closed on nothing), a vacuum switch or sensor, or a proximity sensor at the part (see Sensors and Field Devices).
  • Confirm the release before retreating, and check that no part was carried away.
  • Detect a missing tool or a wrong tool in a changer cell, and keep the tool ID in the program.
  • Sharp edges and pinch points on the tool are hazards to people: guard them or cover them (see Safety: Standards, Safeguarding and Cobots). A tool that can pinch a hand is part of the risk assessment, even on a collaborative robot.

Worked example: holding after the air fails

A vacuum reservoir of 0.5 L at 6 bar feeds a valve that must keep above 4 bar. With a steady leak of 0.1 L/min of free air (the volume at atmospheric pressure), the usable air is V (p1 − p2) = 0.5 × 2 = 1.0 L of free air, which lasts about 10 minutes. Plan the response (a controlled stop and lowering the load) within that time, and check the actual leak rate on the real tool.

Designing a light, stiff tool

DoWhy
Keep the center of gravity close to the flangeThe wrist moment and inertia limits (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time)
Use aluminum, carbon fiber or printed plastic structures, drilled out where the stress is lowMass at the end of the arm costs cycle time and payload
Make the tool stiff enough that its first natural frequency is well above the move frequencyA flexible tool rings after every stop and slows the settle time
Route hoses and cables along the arm with a service loop and strain reliefCables fail where they bend repeatedly (see Commissioning, Maintenance and Troubleshooting)
Standardize the finger and sensor mountsFaster changeover and fewer spares
Define the TCP and payload data once, and put them on the tool’s labelWrong data causes faults and inaccuracy
Add a collision breakaway and a place for a sensorIt is cheaper than the crash

Related

FAQ

How much grip force do I need?

N = m (g + a) × safety factor ÷ (μ × number of contacts). The acceleration of the move usually matters more than the weight. Use the maker’s force chart at your finger length and supply pressure, and a conservative friction coefficient.

Why does my vacuum gripper drop parts?

Leakage on a rough or oily surface, a worn or dirty cup, too little vacuum flow, too long a hose, or sideways acceleration beyond what friction holds. Check the vacuum at the cup, clean or replace cups, shorten the line and reduce acceleration.

Electric or pneumatic gripper?

Pneumatic grippers are cheap, fast and simple but need air and give fixed force and stroke. Electric ones allow adjustable force and stroke and report the width, but cost more and are heavier.

Do I need a tool changer?

If one robot handles several formats or jobs and the changeover time is small compared with the cycle, yes. If the tool changes every cycle, a multi-function tool is usually better.

References

  • ISO 9409-1 (manipulating industrial robots: mechanical interfaces, flange plates); ISO/TS 15066 (grippers on collaborative robots).
  • Schmalz, Piab, SMC, Schunk, Zimmer and OnRobot technical guides and sizing tools for vacuum and gripping force.
  • Monkman, G. J., Hesse, S., Steinmann, R. and Schunk, H., Robot Grippers, Wiley-VCH.

Last reviewed: October 2026. Friction coefficients, forces and times are typical and illustrative: use the component makers’ data and test with real parts.