End-of-Arm Tooling and Grippers
Parallel, angular and vacuum grippers, grip force and vacuum cup sizing, tool changers, compliance and fail-safe design.
What the tool must do
The end-of-arm tool (EOAT) is the part of the robot that touches the work, and it usually decides whether a cell succeeds. It must pick up the part reliably at the speed the cycle needs, release it where wanted, survive variation in the parts, stay within the robot’s payload (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time), and be safe when something goes wrong. Most robot problems that are blamed on the arm are tool problems: a part that slips, a vacuum leak, a tool too heavy or too long.
| Requirement | Question to ask |
|---|---|
| Part | Mass, size, shape, material, surface, variation, fragility, orientation |
| Process | Speed and acceleration, accuracy of the place, force at the place, any contact with a process (welding heat, paint, coolant) |
| Robot | Payload and moment (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time), flange pattern, services on the arm (air, power, signals) |
| Environment | Temperature, dirt, swarf, washdown, cleanroom, explosive atmosphere |
| Safety | What happens on loss of air or power; sharp edges; pinch points (see Safety: Standards, Safeguarding and Cobots) |
| Changeover | How many product types, how long to switch, tool changer or adjustable fingers |
Gripper types
| Tool | Best for | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel gripper | Prismatic parts held between two fingers | Pneumatic or electric; custom fingers for each part; strong and simple |
| Angular (pivot) gripper | Round parts, long reach into machines | Compact; the fingers swing, so the grip point moves |
| Three- and four-finger (centric) grippers | Cylindrical parts, centering a part | Self-centering; good for turned parts |
| Internal (expanding) grippers | Parts held by a bore | Use the inside; no fingers outside |
| Vacuum cups and pads | Flat, smooth, non-porous surfaces: sheet, boxes, glass, trays | Needs a vacuum source and a sensor; leakage on rough surfaces |
| Foam vacuum pads | Porous or rough surfaces, cartons | High flow; seal over small gaps |
| Magnetic grippers | Steel sheet and parts | Residual magnetism; picks up two sheets; limited on oily or thin parts |
| Needle and soft grippers | Fabrics, foam, fragile or irregular items | Specialized; soft fingers conform to the shape |
| Electroadhesive and Bernoulli grippers | Thin, delicate sheets (films, wafers, solar cells) | Little or no contact force |
| Adaptive and robotic hands | Mixed, unknown parts | Expensive and less robust; best for research and special jobs |
Friction grip: how much force?
A parallel gripper holds the part by friction. With a friction coefficient μ between finger and part, a normal force N on each of n contacts, and a part that must be lifted and accelerated (a in addition to gravity) with a safety factor:
μ N n ≥ m (g + a) × SF N = m (g + a) SF ÷ (μ n)
Worked example: a 2.1 kg part
- Two fingers (n = 2), steel parts with rubber-faced fingers, μ = 0.3 (use a low value; oil lowers it), safety factor 2, and a move that accelerates the part at 10 m/s² (about 1 g) upward: N = 2.1 × (9.81 + 10) × 2 ÷ (0.3 × 2) = 139 N per finger.
- A pure static hold, with no acceleration, would need only 69 N: the move, not the weight, sets the force.
- With a high-friction urethane finger face (μ = 0.6) the force halves to 69 N: friction is the cheapest way to cut the force, the gripper size and the weight.
- A pneumatic gripper with a 20 mm piston at 6 bar gives F = P A = 188 N before losses; with a typical efficiency of 80 % split over two fingers that is about 75 N per finger at the cylinder, less at the fingertip if the fingers are long (the force falls with the distance from the pivot or the guide). Use the gripper maker’s force chart at your finger length.
- Two rules: grip force must be ample but not crush the part; and the force the gripper makers quote is at the base of the finger, at the stated pressure, so check the finger length and the supply pressure (a gripper at 4 bar, not 6, delivers two thirds of the force).
- Use form closure where you can: fingers shaped to the part (a V-groove, a pocket) hold it by geometry as well as friction, and need less force.
- Grip where the part is stiff, close to its center of gravity, so it does not rotate between the fingers.
- Electric grippers let you set force and stroke in software and report the width (useful for checking the part), but cost more and are slower to change force.
Vacuum cups
F = ΔP × A permitted mass = F ÷ (g × SF)
Worked example: one cup, then a box
- One 40 mm cup at a vacuum of −0.6 bar (60 kPa below atmosphere): area = π ÷ 4 × 0.04² = 1 257 mm², force = 60 000 × 0.001257 = 75.4 N.
- Vertical lift with a safety factor of 2: mass = 75.4 ÷ (9.81 × 2) = 3.84 kg per cup. Fast horizontal moves or friction-only holding with a factor of 4 or more: 1.92 kg.
- A 5 kg box carried on 4 cups of 30 mm: each gives 42.4 N, together 170 N. With 30 % lost to leakage and tilt, the usable force is 119 N. The load, lifted at 5 m/s² with a factor of 2, is 148 N: not enough.
- Sideways forces are carried by friction, and are small: the cups hold 59 N sideways at μ = 0.5, against a 30 N inertia force at 6 m/s² for the box. Slow the horizontal acceleration, or use cups with a lip, stops or a gripper with side supports.
- Real cup force is lower than the theoretical because of seal leakage, surface roughness and cup flex: use the cup maker’s rated force and keep a factor of 4 for rough, oily or tilted loads.
Worked example: how long to build vacuum?
An ejector with a free-air flow of 25 L/min evacuates the cups and hose. For a volume V = 0.05 L it needs about t = (V ÷ Q) ln(patm ÷ ptarget) = (0.05 ÷ 25 × 60 s) × ln(101.3 ÷ 41.3) = 0.11 s to reach −60 kPa. Doubling the line volume to 0.12 L (a long hose) takes 0.26 s. That is gripper time added to every cycle (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time): keep the ejector close to the cups and the hose short.
| Component | Choice | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cup shape | Flat (stiff, flat sheet), bellows (uneven or curved), oval (long thin parts) | Bellows cups lift and compensate for height; flat cups resist sliding |
| Cup material | Nitrile, silicone, polyurethane | Silicone is soft and marks less; polyurethane wears least; check temperature and oil |
| Vacuum source | Ejector (venturi), pump or blower | Ejectors are light, cheap and use compressed air; pumps and blowers suit high-flow porous loads |
| Control | Vacuum sensor, air-saving valve, blow-off | A pulse of air releases the part cleanly and clears dust |
| Filter | In-line filter near the cups | Dust blocks ejectors; check it on a schedule |
Fingers and stroke
Worked example: how far must the fingers open?
- A part 60 mm wide ±0.5 mm is picked from a nest. The fingers must open to at least the largest part plus a clearance on each side: 60.5 + 2 × 3 = 66.5 mm.
- They must also close on the smallest part: 59.5 mm. The stroke between those two settings, 7.0 mm, is the real working stroke; choose a gripper whose adjustment range and tolerance of the pick location cover it, with the clearance larger than the robot’s placing error.
- Fingers of aluminum instead of steel: a finger of 120 × 20 × 10 mm weighs 65 g in aluminum and 188 g in steel; for two fingers 0.1 m from the wrist axis the difference in inertia is 0.0025 kg·m². Small, but it is mass at the end of the lever; drill out the fingers and use plastic or aluminum where the loads allow.
- Make fingers replaceable and adjustable, with dowel locations, so a worn or damaged finger is changed in minutes and the tool center point is unchanged (see Coordinate Frames and Kinematics).
- Add soft pads (urethane, rubber) where parts are delicate or friction is needed; check they do not mark or leave residue.
- Support long parts at more than one place, or they sag and rotate between the fingers.
- Chamfer the finger tips and the nest so that a part off by a millimeter still goes in.
Compliance and collisions
The robot’s position error (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy) and the part’s variation are rarely zero. Compliance lets the tool give a little: a floating gripper base, a remote center compliance (RCC) device for inserting parts, or a soft finger. A collision sensor (a breakaway clutch with a switch) protects the tool and the robot in a crash, and stops the robot before damage.
Worked example: inserting a 10 mm peg
- The peg has 0.1 mm total clearance in its hole, but the robot and the part position are uncertain to ±0.4 mm (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy). Without help the peg would land on the hole’s edge.
- A lead-in chamfer on the hole of at least 0.4 − 0.1 = 0.35 mm per side lets the peg find the hole; a compliant device lets it follow the chamfer without jamming.
- Jamming: a rigidly held peg that enters the hole with a sideways offset can wedge when the depth of insertion is more than about 1 ÷ (2 μ) times the diameter. With μ = 0.2 that ratio is about 2.5: beyond it, pushing harder only locks the peg. Compliance and a chamfer keep the push along the hole’s axis.
- Force sensing or motor-current monitoring allows a search (a small spiral) and detection of seating (see Vision, Calibration and Accuracy).
Tool changers and multi-function tools
A tool changer lets the robot switch tools automatically: a master plate on the robot and a tool plate on each tool, locked pneumatically or electrically, passing air, power and signals through the coupling. It lets one robot handle several product formats or do several jobs, but adds mass and length (often 0.5 to 2 kg and 30 to 50 mm).
Worked example: what does a changeover cost?
If a tool change takes 3 s to put one tool back and take another, and the cell changes tool 12 times an hour (twice per change: drop and pick), it spends 72 s an hour, or 2.0 % of the time, changing tools. Cheap if the cycle is 20 seconds, expensive if the tool changes every cycle: then use a multi-function tool with two grippers on one plate.
- Multi-gripper tools (two grippers back to back, or a gripper and a vacuum pad) pick one part while carrying another, saving a trip.
- Count the signals and the air lines in the coupler before choosing it; add spare ways.
- Keep tool stands clean and in reach, with a sensor to check that a tool is present in its stand and on the robot.
Fail-safe design and grip checking
- What happens when the air or power fails? A gripper that opens drops the part. Use designs that hold on loss of supply (spring-loaded, self-locking, or with a check valve and an air reservoir) where a dropped part is dangerous or expensive.
- Confirm the grip before the robot moves: an end-of-stroke sensor on the gripper (closed on a part, not closed on nothing), a vacuum switch or sensor, or a proximity sensor at the part (see Sensors and Field Devices).
- Confirm the release before retreating, and check that no part was carried away.
- Detect a missing tool or a wrong tool in a changer cell, and keep the tool ID in the program.
- Sharp edges and pinch points on the tool are hazards to people: guard them or cover them (see Safety: Standards, Safeguarding and Cobots). A tool that can pinch a hand is part of the risk assessment, even on a collaborative robot.
Worked example: holding after the air fails
A vacuum reservoir of 0.5 L at 6 bar feeds a valve that must keep above 4 bar. With a steady leak of 0.1 L/min of free air (the volume at atmospheric pressure), the usable air is V (p1 − p2) = 0.5 × 2 = 1.0 L of free air, which lasts about 10 minutes. Plan the response (a controlled stop and lowering the load) within that time, and check the actual leak rate on the real tool.
Designing a light, stiff tool
| Do | Why |
|---|---|
| Keep the center of gravity close to the flange | The wrist moment and inertia limits (see Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time) |
| Use aluminum, carbon fiber or printed plastic structures, drilled out where the stress is low | Mass at the end of the arm costs cycle time and payload |
| Make the tool stiff enough that its first natural frequency is well above the move frequency | A flexible tool rings after every stop and slows the settle time |
| Route hoses and cables along the arm with a service loop and strain relief | Cables fail where they bend repeatedly (see Commissioning, Maintenance and Troubleshooting) |
| Standardize the finger and sensor mounts | Faster changeover and fewer spares |
| Define the TCP and payload data once, and put them on the tool’s label | Wrong data causes faults and inaccuracy |
| Add a collision breakaway and a place for a sensor | It is cheaper than the crash |
Related
- Industrial Robotics: the overview of this guide.
- Payload, Inertia, Speed and Cycle Time: payload, moment and inertia of the tool.
- Safety: Standards, Safeguarding and Cobots: hazards of the tool and the part.
- Vision, Calibration and Accuracy: positioning error, force sensing and insertion.
- Sensors and Field Devices and Motion Control and Actuators (pneumatics).
FAQ
How much grip force do I need?
N = m (g + a) × safety factor ÷ (μ × number of contacts). The acceleration of the move usually matters more than the weight. Use the maker’s force chart at your finger length and supply pressure, and a conservative friction coefficient.
Why does my vacuum gripper drop parts?
Leakage on a rough or oily surface, a worn or dirty cup, too little vacuum flow, too long a hose, or sideways acceleration beyond what friction holds. Check the vacuum at the cup, clean or replace cups, shorten the line and reduce acceleration.
Electric or pneumatic gripper?
Pneumatic grippers are cheap, fast and simple but need air and give fixed force and stroke. Electric ones allow adjustable force and stroke and report the width, but cost more and are heavier.
Do I need a tool changer?
If one robot handles several formats or jobs and the changeover time is small compared with the cycle, yes. If the tool changes every cycle, a multi-function tool is usually better.
References
- ISO 9409-1 (manipulating industrial robots: mechanical interfaces, flange plates); ISO/TS 15066 (grippers on collaborative robots).
- Schmalz, Piab, SMC, Schunk, Zimmer and OnRobot technical guides and sizing tools for vacuum and gripping force.
- Monkman, G. J., Hesse, S., Steinmann, R. and Schunk, H., Robot Grippers, Wiley-VCH.
Last reviewed: October 2026. Friction coefficients, forces and times are typical and illustrative: use the component makers’ data and test with real parts.
